Mother's
Day Nine News Story 1987
Task:
To investigate and affirm that the documents and historical
timeline facts in relation to the establishment of the Ocean Shores
Estate, are true and correct.
Background
to the Deed of Agreement:
Background supplied by Jan Mangleson President of OSCA Inc.
The
Ocean Shores Community Association (OSCA) began in the early
days of the estate’s formation. Three years ago, OSCA celebrated
fifty years since the opening of the Ocean Shores Administration Centre
(The Roundhouse) on March 29, 1969 by the Hon. S. T. Stephens, Minister
for Housing and Co-Operative Societies. Shortly after came the signing
of the Ocean Shores’ Deed of Agreement. This
is the founding document of the town. It outlined an agreement with
the NSW State Government, Byron Council, Rous County Council (water),
the Municipality of Mullumbimby (electricity provider) the owners of
the dairy farms who sold their properties and Wendell West Australia
Pty Ltd (the developer). Over a period of 25 years the town was to be
developed in three stages.Wendell West sold its Australian interests
to Princess Properties Pty. Ltd who took over as the developer of the
project.
Stage 1 included the Roundhouse, golf course, country
club, Orana Apartments, Orana Bridge, small shopping centre and residential
development.
Stage 2, centred around the Capricornia Canal, was
constructed by Princess Properties and completed by the Bond Corporation.
Stage
3 was never built and became the Billinudgel Nature Reserve
following environmental activism from local groups. Intended for Stage
3 was a civic centre, high school, three primary schools, sports fields,
regional shopping centre, town centre, surf club and more.
The Roundhouse was demolished by Byron Council when it bought the property.
The council subsequently developed and sold the site as 11 large residential
blocks.
click on map to enlarge
The Strategic Plan for the Development:
In
the Princess Properties map dated January 17, 1973, strategic plan showing
essential development elements which included a 2 primary schools, a
high school and sportsfields, a commercial centre, an ocean
outlet for the Capricornia Canal and Marshall's Creek, Shara
Boulevarde to extend the highway through the north of the town to Wooyung
Road and the Wooyung school, 3 reserves for public recreation, a beach
club, many kiliometres of ocean beach, two bridges, a large area set
aside for nature reserve.
The
1975 Real Estate Map of the Stage 1, Stage 2 and the
Stage 3 Ocean Shores Development - click
here
Note:
click
here for the summary of events printed in The Shores Magazine circa
1995.
There is mention of the Deed of Agreement which stated
on p 8 'The original development was covered by a deed of agreement
between the government and the development company which bonded various
issues including the flood outlet before the land was allowed to be
developed or sold.'
Glossery
of Terms:
Compliance - is the state of being in accordance with
established guidelines or specifications, or the process of becoming
so.
A
Deed of Agreement - is a special type of legally binding promise
or a commitment to do something.
_________________________________________________________________________________
DRAFT Questions
1 - 10 for
Proposed Framework for Investigation Purposes
Development of Stage 2 North Ocean Shores;
Question
1 :
Is Byron Shire Council aware that the North Ocean
Shores flood overflow outlet and the proposed Capricornia bridge was
covered by a Deed of Agreement?
COMMENT
for discussion: A bond was to be paid to Council (letter
Shire Clerk S.C Shevellar viewpoints 1-7) to rectify the effect
of flooding due to the closure of the temporary flood overflow near
South Gloden Beach. The bond money was to be used for the construction
and maintenance of a permanent Ocean Outfall at North
Ocean Shores.
Note:
Byron Shire Engineer Mr
Greg Alderson confirms in a letter that the outlet would make a
“significant” difference in flood heights.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Question
2 :
Why did Stage 3 of Ocean Shores not proceed?
Future
plans were tabled for Stage
3 of the development of Ocean Shores . This Stage 3
was to be undertaken in the area north of South Golden Beach around
and including where the ocean outlet existed.
COMMENT
for discussion: On the question of Bonding by Council,
the original developers of the Ocean Shores Estate were ordered
by a Deed of Agreement to bond large amounts of money.
This was in the order of $130,000
of $295,000 to complete outstanding flood outlet which was a condition
of consent for the project.
Byron
Shire Council has steadfastly refused to honour that commitment but
have had control of the Bond money since 1969.
The
calculation at 2% per annum is conservative during that period. Other
flood reduction works were carried out by the adjoining Tweed
Council to drain flood
waters from Tweed cane fields north of Ocean Shores into Ocean Shores
through the Capricornia Canal at no cost to Council. All of this is
clearly evident on public documentation with and many
warnings from previous Governments
of Council's liability for causing the flooding.
Clearly
the monies would be considerable after 60 plus years.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Question 3 :
What would be the amount of money in interest,
accumulated by that bond since 1969?
COMMENT for discussion: Former Council Engineer Mr
Greg Alderson threatened to use that money when a bridge
was not built over the Capricornia Canal.
Note:
The only remedial works to date have been for residents
based at South Golden Beach with Government funding to build
a levee and to remove the flood water from South Golden Beach into
Capricornia
Canal via a flood pump.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Question 4 :
Why
did Council close the overflow outlet at North Ocean Shores without
fulfilling their obligation to address flood mitigation on the floodplain?
Was there any connnection to the Billinudgel Nature Reserve
having wetland status? Who was responsible in making the Billinudgel
Nature Reserve a wetland?
WETLAND
STATUS REMOVED IN 1987:
PRESS
RELEASE July 1, 1987
from the then Minister for Planning and Environment Mr Bob Carr.
'Carr removes wetland status'
The following statement was backed up by a spokeman for Mr Carr who
said a recent revision had shown that 33 hectares of the land was non-wetland
cypress pine and old marsh pastures.
"It never really was wetlands and shouldn't have been included
in the policy in the first place."
Full
Newspaper Article from the Sydney Morning Herald July 1987
COMMENT
for discussion: There is a solution to the flooding problem
which is not harmful to the environment. Hoping Council will listen
to the people who have already been harmed by the neglect to act. There
is a 'duty of care' for Council to protect the residents from studies
and policies that may have been based on misinformation.
_________________________________________________________________________________
LOCAL LOBBY & CONSERVATION GROUP:
Conservation of North Ocean Shores (C.O.N.O.S.) involvement in the region
of North Ocean Shores/Yelgun.
Background:
p2 CONOS Submission
Conservation of North Ocean Shores was established in 1992.
The group’s main objective has been to protect the natural and
cultural values of the lowland coastal ecological communities in the
north of Byron Shire. CONOS was instrumental in the establishment of
the Marshalls Creek & Billinudgel Nature
Reserves.
click
here for map of Billinudgel Nature Reserve 2000
Note:
CONOS objected to the Application No: SSD 8169 and MP 09_0028 MOD 3
for the North Byron Parklands Festival Site gaining permanent approval.
click
here for full document (Objection to North Byron Parklands Festival
Site Development)
Measures taken by NSW Government in Protecting the North Ocean Shores/Yelgun
Site
Compiled by Conservation of North Ocean Shores (CONOS)
1985 SEPP 14 Wetlands No. 57 gazetted by NSW Dept.
of Planning.
1987
NSW Labor Minister for Planning & Environment places Interim
Conservation Order (ICO) over lands at North Ocean Shores / Yelgun following
the
bulldozing of culturally significant coastal lands.
1989
Large areas of North Ocean Shores / Yelgun Referenced by NPWS.
N.B. Only areas of high conservation value meet this criteria.
1990
Commission of Inquiry (COI) into Rezoning of Lands at Ocean Shores,
North. Commissioner Simpson recommends the majority of lands be zoned
for environmental protection due to the areas natural and cultural values.
.... to
2009.
Check
Note:
1.
North Byron Parklands gifted lands which adds to the Billinudgel Nature
Reserve total area.
PRESS RELEASE March 20, 2020
click
here for the ECHO Newspaper article.
Extract from Article: Over 37.15ha of ecologically
significant land has been gifted to the Billinudgel Nature Reserve by
North Byron Parklands. Parklands
general manager Mat Morris said, ‘More than 14 per cent of Parklands’
256ha has been dedicated to National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS).
_________________________________________________________________________________
PRESS
RELEASE September 2, 1995
COMMENT
for discussion: Ocean outlets
in the options to ease flooding.
Full
Newspaper Article
from the Northern Star September 1995
_________________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION:
Billinudgel Nature Reserve - April 1996
A core area of 357 hectares was dedicated, pursuant to the
NP&W Act, as a nature reserve in April 1996. Two
areas of 189.5 hectares and 166.6 hectares were purchased in late 1996
and dedicated as an addition to the Reserve in 1997. The total area
of the Reserve is now approximately 713 hectares.
Billinudgel
Nature Reserve Plan of Management 2000
click
here to access BNR Management Plan 2000
Acknowledgments:
taken from the Billinudgel Nature Reserve Plan of Management November,
2000.
The draft plan of management for Billinudgel Nature Reserve was prepared
by Jane Baldwin, now Community Relations Ranger, North Coast Region,
and this adopted plan of management was prepared by Graeme McGregor,
Planning Officer, Northern Rivers Region.
Valuable input has been provided by
Val and Stan Scanlon of CONOS (Conservation of North Ocean Shores),
Matthew Lambourne of BEACON (Byron Environment and Conservation Organisation),
Richard Whitling of South Golden Beach Progress Association,
Cr. Henry James and Douglas Jardine both of Tweed Shire Council, the
NPWS Lismore District Advisory Committee, Gary Opit, Andrew Benwell
and those people who provided a submission on the draft plan of management.
The input of these people is greatly appreciated by the authors;
NPWS staff including Janet Cavanaugh, Guy Holloway, Lance Tarvey, Bob
Moffat, Max Murphy, Tim Perry, Martin O’Connell, David Charley,
Brett Evans, John Hunter and Diane Mackey also provided valuable input
to this plan.
Cover photograph of Scribbly Gum woodland along the edge of the Capricornia
Canal by D. Milledge.
_________________________________________________________________________________
CORRESPONDENCE with GOVERNMENT:
February 3, 2006
Letter to the Hon Frank Sator MP
Click
here
April
24, 2006
Letter from Director General,
Dept of Natural Resources 2006;
Complete letter
Click here
COMMENT
for discussion: see letter paragraph 5 p1 "The measures
you have suggested, such as dredging and ocean outlets, were considered
in the 1995 Value Management Workshop and leading up to the preparation
of the MCFMP.
They were not adopted principally because of the potential
to adversley impact on the environment, high maintenance costs and because
flooding in Marshalls Creek could be made worse when offshore storm
surge into the estuary and outlets.
There
is a provision to review the MCFMP if a flood event greater than 1 in
10 years level takes place.
This occurred on 30 June 2005 when the biggest flood occurred in Marshalls
Creek."
COMMENT
for discussion: Community groups
fear bund change will increase flooding.
Full
Newspaper Article
from the Echo Newspaper April 10, 2007
_________________________________________________________________________________
Question
5 :
COST of FLOOD STUDIES:
How much has
been spent on flood studies and reports?
Cost to 2001 exceeded $1.25m for flood mitigation
with flood levels knowingly increased on existing residential properties.
1. Don
Page MP letter seeking public inquiry 2001
2. Newspaper
article September 2001 re call for spending inquiry
_________________________________________________________________________________
COMMUNITY
RESPONSE:
Draft North Byron Floodplain Risk Management Plan October 2020
In
2020 Byron Shire Council called for response from community
to NBFRMP 2020 - Draft Plan.
OSCA Inc. conducted a community survey and provide their survey responses
to Byron Shire Council.
OSCA
Reply to Draft Plan 2020
OSCA
Flood Letter & Submission objection responses.
FINAL
- North Byron Floodplain Risk Management Plan October 2020
The
North
Byron Floodplain Risk Management Plan October 2020 (NBFRMP) has
been finalised.
Complete
Document on Byron Shire Council website - click
here
Marshalls
Creek Floodplain Advisory Committee to Byron Shire Council;
Community Representative
Rebecca Brewin (Billinudgel)
Steven Harris (Mullumbimby)
Karl Allen (Mullumbimby)
Matthew Lambourne (Main Arm)
Robert Crossley (New Brighton)
Byron
Shire Council Staff & Councillors
Scott Moffett (BSC Flood and Drainage Engineer)
Phil Holloway (BSC Director of Infrastructure Services)
James Flockton (Coordinator Infrastructure Planning)
Chad Ellis (SES)
Cr Coorey (Councillor)
Ducan Dey (Councillor)
Current
Minutes of Flood Advisory Committee meeting - click
here
Question
6 :
Are there representatives from each area of Marshalls Creek floodplain
on the advisory committee?
Above recommendations: taken from the Final
North Byron Floodplain Risk Management Plan (October 2020)
Questions
for Flood Data Modellers 2022 in relation to the NBFRMP October 2020:
A modeller is someone who makes theoretical descriptions of systems
or processes in order to understand them and be able to predict how
they will develop.
Question
7:
How can we lower the floodwater levels on Marshalls Creek Floodplain?
Comment: TBA
Question
8:
Where does the floodwater flow and pond on the
Marshalls Creek Floodplain?
Comment: Flood
Flow - Flood
Ponding
Question
9:
Why haven't we re opened the flood overflow outlets?
Comment: TBA
Question
10:
Can the excess floodwater be removed from the
floodplain by pumping it directly into the ocean at strategic locations
along the coastline?
Comment: Flood
Flow - Flood
Ponding
_________________________________________________________________________________
Greater
Ocean Shores Flood Prevention & Mitigation Group:
click here to access
map
Documents
and Photo FACTS
compiled by
Jim Mangleson
Foundation Community Representative of the
Marshalls Creek Flood Plain Management Committee
Historical
FACTS Researched by
The late Frank Mills OAM
Former Chairman of OSCA Inc.
Committee Representative for BV Historical Society
Representative on the Abi Group - Member of the Heritage Management
Plan
Photos
& additional documentation
Frank Mills
Reg Burns
Judy Anning
Supported
by OSCA Inc.
Ocean Shores
Community Association Inc.
Registration Inc. Y1833127 ABN:81 081 151 216
Building Community in Ocean Shores since 1970